Portfolio: Future of Learning

In collaboration with Amy Bickerton & Alison Meier

thesis image

The goal of this project was to understand the current state of learning in a college environment, and gather insights on unmet needs for possible future product development.

This was conducted via thorough competitive analysis following extensive testing of existing online learning tools, followed by a series of 28 on-campus interviews at three different San Francisco universities to evaluate students’ current learning experiences and what they might expect or hope for in the future learning landscape.

At least half of the findings fall into a new category we created (that does not appear on the original Territory Map) called Collaboration, Communication and Community. This category describes activities and communication relevant to the entire learning group rather other than a one-to-one or one-to-many connection, and is not necessarily tied to assignment based-work.

Students all responded to personalization of the materials – not just personalized to them or their learning style, but acknowledged that their instructor was providing insights from his/her own experience.

Creating a representative personality or voice is also important for students – uploading images of students, allowing for personalization, etc. This is especially true in the realm of group work, where visualizations of data and information are vitally important for group work. There is no evidence of these kind of management tools currently being used in our assessment of learning products and tools.

Methodology

  • After transcribing the content, the research team combed the interviews for common behaviors described by the students.
  • Once a set of behaviors was identified, we looked for similarities and condensed them into groups, when possible.
  • Representative student quotes were selected to illuminate the behaviors.
  • Emotions and emotional language were also noted and connected to respective behavior(s). We interpreted this language to determine “Target Emotion(s)” (see poster) for each behavior.
  • The behavior was linked to Pearson’s existing feature set (see Territory Map) and, when possible, Pearson’s current state.
  • A recommendation was developed for each behavior, including references to specific software, tools and/or media.



Select another project

img12
research / service

Master's Thesis

Leveraging social tools to build a sustainable food network

Master's Thesis
img1
service

votesmartraleigh

Orienting residents spatially & informationally to all aspects of the voting experience

Vote Smart
img12
YOU ARE HERE:

the future of learning

Investigating learners' habits, existing online learning tools, & assessing needs

Future of Learning
img1
interdisciplinary

bridging the gap

Book & ebook about public-interest architecture co-designed with architects

Bridging the Gap
img12
microsite

socialresponsibility

Corporate social responsibility microsite and companion ebook

Social Responsibility
img1
research / workshop prompt

urban renewal

"What if these spaces were up for debate...and the public could propose their future?"

Urban Renewal
img12
service

social cycle

A wearable, multi-sensory wayfinding system created by and for cyclists.

Social Cycle
img1
research / experience

design camp explorations

Studies in virtual and physical community-building among learners

Design Camp
img12
research / experience

invisible water

Prompting consideration of water use in unexpected ways at the grocery store.

Invisible Water
img1
collaboration

design thinking exhibition

In an effort to expose freshmen to Design Thinking, we designed an exhibiton about design. So meta.

Design Thinking